Public explanation
Use product, security, privacy and support pages to understand concepts, terminology and the questions a customer should resolve.
TextPulse trust center
Use this index to separate public guidance from account-specific evidence. Security, privacy, availability, support, route and commercial decisions should be tied to the current document that governs the actual customer, destination and effective date.
Trust overview
A useful answer identifies what is covered, which system or route it applies to, who issued it, when it became effective and when it should be reviewed again. Undated or universal claims should not control a production decision.
Use product, security, privacy and support pages to understand concepts, terminology and the questions a customer should resolve.
Use authenticated API details, sender records, route settings and account controls for the implementation being tested.
Use the current quote, order form, DPA, SLA and service agreement for rates, legal entity, obligations, support and remedies.
Document map
These public pages explain the current evaluation framework. Exact company, security, data-processing, service-level and commercial commitments must still be confirmed where the requirement calls for written evidence.
Shared responsibility, account and API controls, OTP abuse, data handling, monitoring, incidents and evidence requests.
Security overviewPublic information about personal-data collection, use, protection and user choices. Confirm the policy version that applies.
Privacy policyController and processor roles, lawful processing, minimization, rights, transfers, retention and incident preparation.
GDPR informationMeasurement boundaries, API and delivery indicators, dependencies, incidents, maintenance, support and written SLA terms.
SLA planning guideIntegration, delivery, sender, account, billing and security case preparation without disclosing secrets.
Support centerReview the current public terms, then confirm any customer-specific order, quote or amendment that changes them.
Terms of serviceUnderstand the variables that shape cost and the fields a dated route quote should contain.
Pricing frameworkReview what TextPulse describes publicly and which claims require account or contractual confirmation.
About TextPulse SMSPrepare sales, support, billing, security, privacy or abuse evidence and use the authorized channel.
Contact guideDisclosure matrix
Publishing a checklist is not the same as publishing the underlying evidence. Treat every missing answer as an open due-diligence item rather than assuming the most favorable interpretation.
| Decision area | Public guidance available | Confirm in current written evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Company identity | Platform purpose and public product information. | Contracting legal entity, registration, address, tax and invoice details. |
| Security | Review boundaries, shared responsibility and evidence checklist. | Implemented controls, independent assurance, exceptions, vulnerability and incident terms. |
| Privacy | Privacy and GDPR planning information. | Roles, instructions, DPA, locations, subprocessors, transfers, retention and deletion. |
| Service level | Definitions, metrics and measurement framework. | Numerical targets, exclusions, maintenance, support times, credits and claim process. |
| Coverage and sender | Route-planning and sender guidance. | Countries, networks, sender types, registrations, filtering, throughput and effective date. |
| Pricing | Cost drivers and quote checklist. | Rates, currency, taxes, billing increment, billable states, minimums and validity. |
Buyer workflow
Review evidence in a consistent sequence so technical, legal, security, procurement and operations teams are evaluating the same service boundary.
List countries, traffic type, sender, volume, latency sensitivity, data categories, user risk and business impact.
Separate mandatory controls and contract terms from preferences. Assign an owner and evidence type to every requirement.
Record source, version, date, scope, exceptions and open questions. Do not mark a requirement complete from a marketing sentence alone.
Validate API, sender, delivery reports, failure paths, monitoring, abuse controls, support and reconciliation with representative traffic.
Document gaps, compensating controls, owner, approval date, renewal trigger and conditions that require re-review.
Review route, price, subprocessor, location, API, security, SLA and policy changes before they silently alter the approved design.
Responsible messaging
A secure provider cannot make deceptive, unlawful or poorly controlled traffic trustworthy. Customers should document permission, sender identity, opt-out behavior, content rules, recipient protection and abuse monitoring for each destination.
Change and review
A due-diligence decision can become stale when the route, sender, data flow, application, contract or risk changes. Establish review triggers instead of relying only on a yearly calendar reminder.
New API version, authentication method, webhook design, data field, integration environment or monitoring path.
New destination, sender, traffic class, volume profile, route, carrier behavior or production incident.
New contract, policy, legal requirement, subprocessor, data location, assurance report, SLA or company entity.
Evidence register
A due-diligence folder should show why a requirement was marked complete, not simply contain a collection of files. Maintain a register that connects every decision to the exact evidence reviewed and makes expired or superseded information visible.
| Register field | Record | Review control |
|---|---|---|
| Requirement | Clear security, privacy, service, legal, route or commercial condition and its owner. | Identify whether it is mandatory, conditional or an accepted preference. |
| Evidence identity | Document title, issuer, version, date, scope and authoritative storage location. | Do not rely on an undated screenshot or copied marketing text. |
| Assessment | How the evidence satisfies the requirement, exceptions found and any compensating control. | Name the reviewer and approval date instead of using an unexplained check mark. |
| Validity | Expiry, renewal date, contract term and events that can make the evidence stale. | Alert before expiry and after a material service or deployment change. |
| Open action | Missing answer, responsible party, due date and production condition. | Prevent an unresolved mandatory item from silently becoming accepted risk. |
No. It organizes public information and identifies evidence to request. A requirement is complete only after the current evidence has been reviewed for the actual service, account and scope.
Verify the legal entity, address, registration, invoice and tax details in the current order form, service agreement or other authoritative commercial document before contracting.
This page does not claim an unverified certification or audit. Request current evidence through the authorized channel and verify its issuer, period, systems, locations and exceptions.
No. It explains how to evaluate service levels. Only an applicable written SLA can define numerical commitments, measurement, exclusions, support targets, credits and remedies.
Set a regular review and trigger an earlier review when routes, countries, senders, data, subprocessors, locations, APIs, controls, contracts or material incidents change.
Record the requirement, source, scope, review date, open issue and person responsible for the decision.